By: Ramon T. Bautista, John Michael Opendo, and Jayzamel Vista In commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the declaration of martial law, the San Beda Law - Human Rights Advocates (HRA) conducted its first face-to-face seminar since the pandemic, titled “SALAMISIM: Mga Gunita at Katotohanan ng Batas Militar” last September 24. The event was a … Continue reading San Beda HRA tackles Historical Revisionism on Martial Law’s 50th Anniversary
Aberca v. Ver, G.R. No. L-69866, April 15, 1988
In the case of Chavez v. PCGG, it was held that the Supreme Court may require the PCGG to disclose the details of any agreement concerning the Marcoses.
Mijares v. Ranada, G.R. No. 139325, April 12, 2005
The Marcoses’ defenses were a sham and evidently calibrated to compound and confuse the issues. The High Court found this to be an attempt to delay the goal of asset recovery by their evasiveness and the expedient profession of ignorance.
Imelda Romualdez-Marcos v. Republic of the Philippines, G.R. No. 189505, April 25, 2012
The Marcoses’ defenses were a sham and evidently calibrated to compound and confuse the issues. The High Court found this to be an attempt to delay the goal of asset recovery by their evasiveness and the expedient profession of ignorance.
Chavez v. Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG), G.R. No. 130716; December 9, 1998
In the case of Chavez v. PCGG, it was held that the Supreme Court may require the PCGG to disclose the details of any agreement concerning the Marcoses.
THE BARRISTER 